Monday, May 13, 2024

The 2024 JKTS Awards: The Reader's Choice Nominations!

 
           

The Reader's Choice Nominations!
(The nominations ballot has closed! VOTING begins 5.23.24)

After hundreds of nomination ballots were entered, 5 nominees made the cut in each category. Three categories were so close (statistical ties), that 6 nominees were named. As it turned out, there were enough nominees in the Outstanding Broadway Debut category, that we split it into two - one for male debut and one for female! (And next year, this category will be gender neutral, with 10 nominees.) Finally, we decided that the Time To Go category was not in the proper spirit of our annual awards, so we eliminated it.

Here's how the nominations ended up per show:


  • Water For Elephants - 11
  • The Outsiders - 8
  • The Notebook - 7
  • Back to the Future - 5

  • Here Lies Love - 4
  • Lempicka - 4
  • Merrily We Roll Along - 4
  • Suffs - 4

  • Illinoise - 3
  • Sweeney Todd - 3
  • The Who's Tommy - 3

  • Gutenberg! The Musical! - 2
  • How to Dance in Ohio - 2
  • The Great Gatsby - 2


  • Harmony - 1
  • Hell's Kitchen - 1
  • Spamalot - 1
  • Stereophonic - 1
  • The Heart of Rock and Roll - 1
Don't forget to vote AND to tell your theater-loving friends! More votes means better results! (Voting runs 5.23.24 - 5.30.24!)



Friday, May 10, 2024

Broadway Games: The 2023 - 2024 Musical Dinner Party: Your Guest List

Thanks to all of you who sent in your proposed guest list! Below is the final guest list, a summary of those characters that got the most invitations. 

Broadway Games: The 2023 - 2024 Musical Dinner Party
Your Guest List

Vintage Broadway Musical Dinner Party c. 2014

Your Hostess:
Sweeney Todd's Mrs. Lovett

Your Guests:

Stepmother - Once Upon a One More Time
Ninoy Aquino - Here Lies Love
Doc Brown - Back to the Future

Rabbi - Harmony
Drew - How to Dance in Ohio
Kirsten Amensen - Days of Wine and Roses

Younger Noah - The Notebook
Jacob Jankowski - Water For Elephants
Ponyboy Curtis - The Outsiders

Tamara de Lempicka - Lempicka
Inez Milholland - Suffs
Davis - Hell's Kitchen

Bobby - The Heart of Rock and Roll
Carl - Illinoise
Jay Gatsby - The Great Gatsby

And there you have it.

We hear that Mrs. Lovett will provide the catering. Jay Gatsby will provide the venue. Carl and Drew will dance to Bobby's band, which will provide the entertainment. And Tamara de Lempicka will do guest portraits as souvenirs.

Oh to be a fly on the wall when Stepmother has had a few too many...toxic...

Coming Monday! The nominations begin!
 
           

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Play It Again: Damn Yankees' "Whatever Lola Wants"

Play It Again:
Damn Yankees"Whatever Lola Wants"

For this new series, Jeff has invited me to choose some classic Broadway show tunes and compare versions of these songs from several different cast recordings. Wherever possible, I’ll link to the songs on YouTube, where I listen to most of them myself.



This week I compare a few recordings of “Whatever Lola Wants” from Richard Adler and Jerry Ross’s classic
Damn Yankees. I’ve actually never had an opportunity to see the show (or the movie), but of course I’m quite familiar with this quintessentially seductive song, in which the title temptress unsuccessfully tries to cajole her married target. 


Unless I’ve missed something, it looks like there are only three full recordings of Damn Yankees, a meager selection for such a famous Golden Age title, and two of them feature Gwen Verdon as Lola. To make up for this, I’ve also included my thoughts on a version of the song recorded by Ella Fitzgerald - although I’ll refrain from giving it any star ratings, since it’s a special exception to my precedent of only reviewing entries from full cast recordings or soundtracks. 


My overall favorite version is marked with two stars (**); one star (*) is used to indicate that a particular version stands out in terms of singing, orchestra, sound, or other miscellaneous qualities.



ORIGINAL BROADWAY CAST (1955
) - YouTube


Lola: Gwen Verdon


SINGING: Having just watched a juicy clip of Verdon performing the song on an old Tony telecast, I was a little surprised at how straightforward she sounds on the original recording. It’s not bad, of course, but it’s a little plainer than I expected in terms of characterization, and her accent is a bit inconsistent. (Of course I realize that her singing wasn’t necessarily the main attraction when she created this role on stage!)


ORCHESTRA: The orchestration is surprisingly sparse for most of the song, with percussion dominating, and just an intermittent string background and a few brass punctuations. This obviously does not reflect a lack of resources, because the gorgeous dance break is full and luxuriant by any measure.


SOUND: It’s not the clearest sound overall. The vocals overpower the accompaniment in the sung sections, but the orchestra sounds much clearer in the dance break.


MISCELLANEOUS: The tempo feels a tiny bit slower than the movie and revival versions.




**
MOTION PICTURE SOUNDTRACK (1958) - YouTube


Lola: Gwen Verdon


*SINGING: It’s clear from the first few lines that this is a more calculated and ambitious take on the song, with character-driven vocal touches like the dips and contours on her delivery of the lyrics “what I aim for.” These effects are used liberally but judiciously throughout the song. Her actual singing is also just better than on the original cast recording, especially on extended notes, and she has also perfected her character accent.


*ORCHESTRA: Very lush throughout, with a much greater variety of instrument groupings providing the fills between vocal lines. It’s a song that’s always going to call for a percussion-heavy arrangement, but it’s a little more subtle here than in other versions.


*SOUND: Very clear and well-balanced; orchestral details are vivid in the sung parts as well as the dance break.


MISCELLANEOUS: The tempo is a little faster, and the dance break is extended for the movie.



BROADWAY REVIVAL CAST (1994)
- YouTube


Lola: Bebe Neuwirth


SINGING: I really enjoy Neuwirth’s take, which is very breathy and character-driven, with some screeching and growling as well as singing (at least in the first half of the song). Her little shout-outs during the dance break are very effective, and her more powerful vocals in the final section provide for a thrilling ending. Overall, Neuwirth’s actorly approach is very different from Verdon’s, but equally gratifying; I slightly favor the latter only because it relies a little more on singing and a little less on what you might call “special effects.” 


ORCHESTRA: The orchestrations are fuller than the original in the sung parts, which I appreciate, and sound terrific during the dance break. 


SOUND: The sound is a little muted but generally clear, with a good balance between voice and orchestra. 


*MISCELLANEOUS: This version features a different, ultra-brassy dance break that works itself into a frenzy, with a wonderfully menacing sound to highlight Lola’s dangerous allure.



BONUS: “ELLA SINGS BROADWAY” (1963)
- YouTube


Lola: Ella Fitzgerald


SINGING: Not being restricted to creating a specific dramatic character, Fitzgerald is free to make the song her own, and her gripping vocals are, of course, on a whole different level. Her sensuous extended notes and slightly improvised rhythms make the song come alive in her own unique way. I especially enjoyed the ending, which brilliantly features Fitzgerald’s classic gravelly sound.


ORCHESTRA: The arrangement has a traditional big-band sound (lots of brass and no strings), overlaid with a Latin-esque lilt, and - in a very 1960s touch - tinged with a twangy, metallic guitar sound.


SOUND: The sound is clear and expansive, with an immersive stereo sound.


MISCELLANEOUS: In general, of course, this is an entirely different take on the material, with a focus on the big voice and the big band. With no need for dancing, the tempo can be slowed to enhance the alluring tone of the words and music.

Monday, May 6, 2024

2023 - 2024 Broadway Musical Logos: Illinoise

21 openings of musicals this season - 6 revivals and 15 new - means so many logos to look at and love. Today, we bring you our thoughts on the last one: the beautiful and emotional dance piece, Illinoise. Based on the iconic Sufjan Stevens album, the show rolled onto Broadway at the last minute, and we are all the better for it. Is the key art as lovely as the show it represents?

2023 - 2024 Broadway Musical Logos: 
Illinoise


The short answer to the question above is a resounding "absolutely!" Where do I start? The nightshade of blue is rich and slightly varied, allowing the brightness of the imagery to really stand out. Much like the night sky and campfire of the show's setting, it allows the glow of light beneath the picture of the moth, wings fully extended, as well as the glowing orbs that dot each "i" in the title.


The bright yellow of the all-caps sans-serif of the font is both eye-catching and manages to draw your eye to the entire logo. It works both separately and together. Further, the tittles of the "i"'s do double duty as representations of the prominent use of light orbs throughout the performance, which in turn are used to signify the three most important people in the protagonist Henry's life - Carl, Shelby and Douglas.

  

The iconic usage of the moth as the primary image of the key art also has many levels. Moths, in general, symbolically represent life, death and rebirth, and also transformation and coming of age. All of these elements figure into the story and themes of the musical, not to mention the fact that the three vocalists - the voices of the show - are named after different months and wear moth wings. (Stevens himself wore such wings while performing his album.)


Most significantly, the moth depicted in the logo has its thorax and abdomen an image of Henry himself, red cap, open shirt, shorts and hands holding the straps of his backpack. And which character goes through the biggest, most cathartic transformation following a death? Henry, flanked by two illuminating lanterns, just as in the show.

Like the show itself, this logo is both simple and deeper with meaning, artful and sensitive. And beautiful.

Grade: A+

Friday, May 3, 2024

Broadway Games: The 2023 - 2024 Musical Dinner Party: Who Are You Inviting?

Broadway shows have a rich history of dramatic dinner parties, and now that this epic-sized season of new musicals has come to an end, we thought it would be fun to have a virtual dinner party ourselves! But first, we need a guest list. That's where you come in! 

Broadway Games: The 2023 - 2024 Musical Dinner Party
Who Are You Inviting?


Which characters from each new musical from the 2023 - 2024 season would you invite to a fancy dinner party? Yes, we said character, not actor. For example, last year you might have invited Aunt Debra from Kimberly Akimbo, but not Bonnie Milligan. Get it?

Here's what you need to do:
1. For each listed musical below, select ONE character from that show that you want to invite. (If you don't see your choice, pick "Other" and type in the name you want!)

2. Select one name for as many or as few shows as you like. Of course, all would be great, but we just want you to have fun and participate!

3. Finally select ONE of the choices for the dinner party host. This question is mandatory.

4. When you are done, be sure to tap the "Finish" button at the bottom of the survey if it doesn't finish for you, or your entry won't count! (And please share on social media!)

This poll will end at 6PM (Eastern) on Thursday, May 9th.
The final guest list will post on Friday, May 10th!

Thanks for playing!

Loading...

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

The 2024 Tony Awards: About Those Nominations...

After a huge number of productions opening by the season deadline, the Tony Awards nominating committee certainly had their work cut out for them! With 10 new plays, 5 play revivals, 15 new musicals, 6 musical revivals, and 3 special even productions, there were a lot of choices. There are always surprises - happy and shocking - and this year is no different. Here are our two cents worth!


The 2024 Tony Awards:
About Those Nominations...

Earlier this week, we listed the nominees we hoped would make the list from the 12 shows we've seen so far. And we did pretty well, too. 40 of our "hoped for"s made the cut - including every nomination Back to the Future, Days of Wine and Roses, Illinoise, Lempicka, Purlie Victorious, The Notebook and Water For Elephants got!

 
  


Of course, there were some disappointments. It's a shame that the brilliant performance of Michael Esper's Appropriate performance was overlooked. Ditto the sharp villainy of Paul Alexander Nolan in Water For Elephants. That Joy Woods is missing from the list is a shame, as is the completely forgotten cast of Illinoise. As for the egregiously overlooked, 
I think history will show that both Ingrid Michaelson's score for The Notebook was too rapidly dismissed, as was the pitch perfect score of Water For Elephants by PigPen Theatre Co., and probably Lempicka's song list, too.

There were a few pleasant surprises, too. The bittersweet brilliance of Maryann Plunkett and Dorian Harewood wasn't a shoo-in. Neither was the long-closed recognition of Here Lies Love, or the complex, often dissonant score for Days of Wine and Roses by Adam Guettel. And though I'd have loved to see Lempicka in a few categories (no lighting or costumes?), I'm glad Eden Espinosa and Amber Iman were honored.

  

We still have four shows to see (The Outsiders, The Who's Tommy, Suffs and Stereophonic) before the Tonys are handed out. With a combined 32 nominations between them, we have a lot to look forward to and debate their worthiness. I dare say Mike and I are even more excited to see them now! And the accolades heaped upon Hell's Kitchen has re-sparked our interest, too.

All of them can't win, but in most categories, I'm pretty sure we'll be thrilled no matter whose names are called on June 16th. Again, congratulations to all the nominees, and to all involved in every show of the season.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...