Showing posts with label Michael Esper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Esper. Show all posts

Thursday, May 27, 2021

At This Performance: Van Hughes in American Idiot

Back in April, Mike wrote an article about his favorite performance of the role of St. Jimmy in his favorite musical, American Idiot (HERE). Today, he shares his thoughts on one performer who understudied all three principal male roles, a performer he had the opportunity to see in all three roles!

At This Performance:
Van Hughes in American Idiot


In the original Broadway run of American Idiot, Van Hughes served as understudy for all three of the young men whose story the show is about: restless wanderer Johnny, sudden family man Will, and injured soldier Tunny. In this blog, Jeff has invited me to reflect on my experience seeing Hughes in all three of these roles during my multiple trips to the show.


I first saw Hughes take on the role of Will, who is unable to accompany his friend Johnny on his adventure when he finds out his girlfriend is pregnant. While this seems to me like the most straightforward of the three roles, it’s also true that the actor playing Will is on stage almost the whole time and has to create some kind of character arc out of a small amount of material. Van Hughes’ take on the role was just as compelling as – and, to be honest, very similar to – that of Michael Esper, the regular performer. The main difference that I noticed was their vocal delivery in “Novacaine” and “Nobody Likes You,” for which Hughes gave a more traditional reading alongside Esper’s deliberately strained thinness. They were both great in the part, and they even looked a little bit alike.


I next saw Hughes when he substituted for Stark Sands in the part of Tunny, who runs away with Johnny to the big city but quickly finds himself being seduced into the army. Once again, Hughes pretty much nailed it, but in this case I must admit that Sands had the edge. Some of the reasons were a bit superficial: Stark Sands simply looked the part of someone who has it in him to be both a trouble-making slacker and a clean-cut soldier, whereas Van Hughes’ vaguely edgier look didn’t fit so well here. The “Extraordinary Girl” flying sequence was noticeably less tight when Hughes was in the role, especially the speed of some of the rotations (but this is something that I’m sure would be corrected if he had played the role for a longer term). And, although I don’t know exactly what the ranges are for the parts, it seemed like Hughes’ voice was not quite as well-suited to the relatively high tessitura of a song like “City of the Dead.” But these are largely quibbles from someone who saw the show too many times. Hughes gave a convincing performance, wringing out all of the heartache and uplift to be found in the journey of Tunny, whose story is somehow both the most tragic and ultimately the most joyous in the show.

I was finally able to see Hughes’ take on the central character of Johnny for the first - but not nearly the last - time when he played the role opposite Melissa Etheridge as St. Jimmy. And even though Etheridge is a genuine star in real life, it was Hughes who gave the standout performance, delivering a stunning interpretation of this very enigmatic role. It would be impossible to give a ranking of his performance with respect to that of regular star John Gallagher, Jr.; it doesn’t even feel quite right to compare them. While both performances were finely tuned to the role, their choices were categorically different, with very different benefits and rewards proceeding from these choices.


If you saw Gallagher in the role of Johnny, you know that he created a unique, fascinating character played with amazing discipline and precision. His Johnny was also, I think, rather stylized, a creation perfectly suited to the world of American Idiot but perhaps, I must admit, not very much like any person I’ve met in the real world. (This is not really a  criticism, and I’ll just leave it at that, since the topic here is Van Hughes.) Anyhow, all of this discipline and precision also meant that Gallagher’s performance was tightly constrained – and that’s something that was not at all true of Hughes’s performance, with very affecting results. Hughes attempted to show nothing more than a regular guy, slightly bored and resentful of his home situation, who decides to go on what he thinks will be an exciting journey but which will really end up dragging him down to hell and back. This was perhaps not as tightly wrought or ambitious a characterization as Gallagher’s, but the rewards were just as potent, because Hughes was very convincing in his vivid highs and exquisitely painful lows.



And so Hughes’s Johnny jumped up and down like a little boy on Christmas morning when he was about to leave with his best friend on a cross-country trip; when he got there, he swung his guitar playfully as he delighted in the prospect of conquering his new city. (Gallagher’s Johnny, so tightly wound from start to finish, would never do these things, and we wouldn’t want him to). Having established this, Hughes enabled himself to really bring out the horror of Johnny’s steady descent. And it was a nuanced, incremental one: although the effects of his drug use were starting to change him, Johnny was still basically a happy and optimistic guy when he first made love with Whatsername; much less so the second time, as St. Jimmy’s influence grew and the drugs became as important as the sex; and still less so by the time he sang “When It’s Time” to her as she slept. By the time he was threatening her with a knife (“Know Your Enemy”), the descent was complete, but significantly more shocking under Van Hughes’s performance, because this is something we could never have imagined of the young man at the start of the show.



Hughes went on to succeed Gallagher as the regular portrayer of Johnny on Broadway - not a surprise, considering how compelling his “trial run” proved to be - and he also headlined the show when it began its national tour. This gave me the opportunity to see his wonderful performance several more times, and it only got better as he gained experience in the role. 


#2565

 

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Broadway Boys: Mr. October 2014: Michael Esper

Mr. October 2014
Michael Esper

WHY HE'S MR. BROADWAY: One of my favorite things about frequently attending Broadway (and off-Broadway) shows is watching performers whose work I love grow and take on more and more challenges.  Mr. October is one such guy.  Though he's only been on Broadway proper four times, his theatre resume is impressive.  It includes such off-Broadway high profile projects as Tales from Red Vienna (with Nina Arianda), Assistance, As You Like It, The Intelligent Homosexual's Guide...(by Tony Kushner), The Four of Us, and subUrbia.  He's also done his share of film and television, including A Beautiful Mind, Frances Ha, Runner Runner, Nurse Jackie, Person of Interest and the short-lived Do No Harm.    On Broadway, he started out by co-starring in the revival of A Man For All Seasons and later co-starred with Linda Lavin in The Lyons.  He's probably best known (so far) for playing Will in Green Day's American Idiot.  And now he's the lead in Sting's The Last Ship.  Isn't it refreshing that when you look an actor up on Wikipedia, he's described as being "notable for his work on the stage"?  That's Michael EsperMr. Broadway!

IN PHOTOS:
Head Shots and Candids







Off-Broadway
subUrbia,  Tales From Red Vienna, Assistance, The Intelligent Homosexual's Guide...







Film and Television
Frances Ha, Person of Interest, Nurse Jackie, Do No Harm







Broadway
American Idiot, The Lyons, The Last Ship











IN VIDEO:

"Wake Me Up When September Ends" 
from American Idiot (with John Gallagher, Jr. and Stark Sands)



Jeff
6.033

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

REVIEW: The Lyons


BE SURE TO NOMINATE YOUR FAVORITE SHOWS 
AND STARS FOR THE 2ND ANNUAL JKTS AWARDS!
CLICK HERE!

Review of the Saturday, May 5 evening performance at the Cort Theatre in New York City.  Starring Linda Lavin, Dick Latessa, Michael Esper, and Kate Jennings Grant.  A new play by Nicky Silver.  Directed by Mark Brokaw.  2 hours, including one intermission.  Adult language and situations.


Grade: B+


Given its characters and content - a hateful, deceitful family brought together by the impending death of its patriarch - I'm surprised at how much I enjoyed The Lyons the new play by Nicky Silver which opened recently on Broadway.  The very definition of "dark comedy," this show is a riot, with the laughs coming fast and furious.  As funny as the play is, it is also full of vitriol and just plain nastiness.  There isn't a likable person in the bunch, unless you enjoy the company of those who lie to each other as much as they lie to themselves.  That they are named "the Lyons" is no mistake as they circle each other like caged, angry cats, claws and fangs at the ready to tear apart each other at the first sign of weakness.


Meet the Lyons family: Esper, Latessa, Lavin and Jennings Grant


Mark Brokaw's direction is tight and fast-paced, with its slower moments carefully chosen.  He has guided his cast carefully, helping each to navigate the tricky line between complete nastiness and giving just enough softness so that we might find these people at least compelling enough not to leave the theatre screaming in disgust.  Both director and playwright fully understand that all the witty one-liners and biting arguments only really work if you can find some reason to be invested in the lives of these characters, even for a brief two hour stay.  Still, there are a couple of times when the change in tone is so abrupt it is jarring, and nothing in act one really prepares you for act two.  While those abrupt twists and turns are realistic in living your own life, it makes for some discomfort as you sit there witnessing it.  That said, it is all worth it in the end.  The top-notch acting makes it all worthwhile.


Mr. Lyons and the nurse: Latessa and Pressley

None of the characters are what they seem to be on the surface, which is all they allow each other to see.  And each actor plays that duplicity to perfection, including the two supporting characters.  Brenda Pressley plays a no nonsense nurse, whose years attending to the ill has hardened her to the point that she has no bedside manner left.  She is sassy and yet, when she lets her guard down finally, you can see what she once was: a compassionate caregiver.  In a small but pivotal role as a real estate agent, Gregory Woodell has a relatively complex character to portray in a brief scene in act two.  His character's duplicity is multifaceted: a real estate agent who is really an actor who plays straight for professional reasons, and is unwittingly part of a deep secret.  That secret, revealed in a pretty surprising way, results in an even more surprising turning point for one of the Lyons, and a delicious "a ha" moment for the audience.  Woodell plays it all smoothly and with brutish physicality.

"Have I got an apartment for you!"
Esper and Woodell

"Dysfunctional" doesn't really even come close to describing just what a hot, pardon the expression, fucked up mess that the Lyons family is.  All four have enough baggage and back-story that any one would be enough for a whole play.  I'm not sure I could take it.  As it is, we find that the family really has no business being together.  No one is honest; all of them hold secrets - deep dark ones, any one of which would destroy most families.  But the Lyons feed off of each other in a dangerous, four-way co-dependency that makes for delicious theatre, but rather rotten real life.  The impetus for their gathering together is that the father is near death - a fact withheld from both adult children.

Brother and Sister Lyons: Jennings Grant and Esper

Kate Jennings Grant is the long suffering alcoholic daughter whose guilt has turned her into a lying mess of nerves, ready at the slightest provocation to unleash waves of self-pity and anger at everyone but herself.  That Ms. Grant lets us see that her anger is heavily selfish without ever saying it, is a credit to the internal investment she has given to her portrayal.  And that the character is a crazy mess of both of her parents makes the character all the more interesting.  The same can be said of the son, brilliantly played to the emotional hilt by Michael Esper.  His take on the son, gay and shunned by the father, is that the character is a complex mix of self-delusion, self-pity and anger (see the trend?), and a pathological need for validation.  The son actually goes through the most in the course of the play - confronting his father and offering forgiveness, a shocking revelation about his personal life, and a personal health crisis are but three things.  And Esper plays each moment brilliantly.  It is a shame that his efforts have not resulted in awards recognition.  His performance is one I won't forget.  Equally unforgettable, but for entirely different reasons, is Dick Latessa as the father of the Lyons den.  Pale and gaunt, Latessa holds court from his death bed with a filthy mouth - his impending death seems to be license to say EXACTLY what he feels - and his timing is impeccable.  And like the rest of the company, it is the finding the humanity in all of the ugliness that shows the real skill of this accomplished actor.

Mr. and Mrs. Lyons: Lavin and Latessa

I was dying to see what it was that led Linda Lavin to give up two sure chances to create a role on Broadway to create a new character off-Broadway.  As it turns out, both of those roles are Tony nominated, too.  But the gamble might have paid off, anyway.  The play she did chose, this one, went to Broadway and she earned a Tony nomination in the process.  This is a juicy, epic role, rare these days for actresses "of a certain age," and one that Ms. Lavin has taken to heart, body and soul.  Critics have hailed her performance as brilliant, a masterpiece, and the pinnacle of her career.  Both the award nominations and critical adoration are, I'm glad to say, completely warranted.  This is a difficult role, as the woman she plays is vicious, mean and cruelly honest in the end.  And yet, you must feel drawn to her - she is both catalyst and conclusion - even if you don't sympathize with her.  Up until the end of the play, she is no more or less guilty, self-pitying or angry than the rest of the family.  Up until the end of the play, her cutting wit and harsh assessment of others will have you rolling in the aisles.  Sure, she's not a likable woman, but you can understand her.  She suffers like all wives and mothers do.

And then, there is the end of the play.  Her shocking revelation and exit speech - and I mean your-jaw-hits-the-floor-and-you-can't-breathe-or-even-move shocking - garnered Lavin an unparalleled collective gasp, and finally, amazed exit applause the night I attended.  That moment is a humdinger and one I won't likely forget in years.  In lesser hands, the role of Mrs. Lyons would grate on the most patient of people.  But Ms. Lavin, who provides a master class here on voice modulation, pregnant pauses, meaningful glances and double-takes, is completely in control, carefully manipulating us into paying attention, understanding her side, and maybe even sympathizing with her.  Whether you like Mrs. Lyons or not is a matter of taste.  But you can't help but love a tour-de-force performance by one hell of an actress.

At its heart, The Lyons is a cautionary tale about families, secrets and trust.  You'll probably leave the theatre with your funny bone sated.  And you'll probably leave feeling a bit perplexed.  After all, what you've just seen is a shocking display by a group of people you would hate in real life.  I know I was glad to have met the Lyons family.  Now I know what to watch out for and what kind of people to avoid.  The next morning, I called BOTH of my parents, told them I loved them, and we talked for nearly an hour.  I felt cleansed.

(Production photos by Carol Rosegg)


Jeff
3.251
@jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (email); Comment below (Blogger)

Saturday, March 31, 2012

JKTS Interactive: HOT/HOTTER: Round 10: Young and Brooding

PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO VOTE IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL!
LOOK TO YOUR LEFT!

As we enter Week 10 of selecting the Sexy 16, we look to two of Broadway's up and coming young talents.  Both of these uniquely handsome guys has already had a career that shows their versatility.  Both seem equally at home in musicals and plays, comedies and dramas.

Andrew Durand first burst onto the scene in Spring Awakening, went on to co-star in Yank, and currently stars in War Horse.
Michael Esper is probably best know for playing Will in American Idiot, most recently co-starred in Assistance, and is currently Broadway-bound in The Lyons.

REMEMBER: You are rating BOTH guys on their cuteness, not your favorite performance!  Give the higher score to the guy you think is HOTTEST.  If you think they are equally cute, give them both the same score.  But be sure to give BOTH of them a score!

To get you started, here are a couple pictures of each guy, followed by the survey.  Then there are some more photos to help you make your final decision!  No matter what, GIVE A SCORE to BOTH GUYS!


                         ANDREW DURAND                          MICHAEL ESPER





   


                      ANDREW DURAND                          MICHAEL ESPER




















THIS POLL WILL CLOSE AT 10PM ON FRIDAY, APRIL 6.


Jeff
3.212
@jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (email); Comment below (Blogger)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...