Showing posts with label Next Fall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Next Fall. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

At This Theatre: The Hayes

At This Theatre:
The Hayes

Home to the most recent Best Play Tony Award winner (Purpose), The Hayes Theatre, renamed to honor the first lady of the American Theater, Helen Hayes, started its life in 1912 as The Little Theatre. (That name is still engraved in marble over the door.) Over the intervening years it has been home to a wide variety of performances - solo shows, plays and musicals - remarkable for Broadway's smallest house.

Currently home to Second Stage Theater, the space has been home to such classics as Gemini, Torch Song Trilogy, The Last Night of Ballyhoo, The Nerd, Rock of Ages and The Humans. Time really flies, I'm telling you - I haven't seen a show there in fifteen years!

The Hayes Theatre Today

The Little Theatre circa 1912

Number of Shows We've Seen There:
4
Next Fall, Romance/Romance, Sally Marr...and Her Escorts, Xanadu

   



Next Fall
This play, about a gay couple facing the harsh reality of life was all about what happens in a crisis when one of them is deeply religious and the other is an atheist. It starred Patrick Breen and Patrick Heusinger as that couple, with Maddie Corman, Cotter Smith, Sean Dugan and Connie Ray offering terrific performances in support. Part sit-com, part morality play, I'll always remember this play as being entertaining from start to finish.





Romance/Romance
 was the very definition of a "small musical." Actually, it was two musicals. Act One was The Little Comedy about a pair of aristocratic lovers in turn of the century Vienna; Act Two was Summer Share about a pair of couples and the temptations of the August heat and a beach vacation in The Hamptons hold. Just four people made up the cast - Scott Bakula, Alison Fraser, Deborah Graham and Robert Hoshour. It was a delight, and, yes, romantic. And the perfect antithesis of that season's biggest hit, The Phantom of the Opera. Frankly, I'm surprised that this isn't performed more often.




Sally Marr...and Her Escorts
 
was a play about the mother of Lenny Bruce and her life, sordid details and all. It was an interesting play, but really, its star, Joan Rivers, was the reason to see it. She was honored with a 1994 Tony Award nomination for Best Actress in a Play. I'm glad I got the opportunity to see this comedy legend, though I wish she had been given better material to work with. Legend has it she was buried with a copy of this play's script.
 





Xanadu
Mike and I will always remember this as the show we went to see purely to find out just how bad it would be. We frequently reminisce about our literally jaw-dropping shock at just how damned good it was! A campy spoof of a campy movie musical made the most of the amazing film soundtrack turned musical theater score by John Farrar and rock legend Jeff Lynne of E.L.O. fame, and leaned into the fun with heart and some terrific staging. The cast was made up of what are now contemporary theater royalty including Kerry Butler, Cheyenne Jackson, Mary Testa, Jackie Hoffman and the late, great Tony Roberts. We loved it so much, we saw it several times including one from on stage. It would be hard to beat the original, but I'd love to see a revival of this one!

Friday, May 28, 2010

A Tony That Won't Be Awarded...This Season

The lead up to the Tony nominations was a time full of hypothesizing and wishful thinking (and probably a lot of drinking).  Then, immediately following the nominations the frenzy of woulda, coulda, shoulda and anger at omissions/shock at inclusions reactions come at a rapid pace.  Then the guessing, educated and "gut", starts until everyone has made their choices (adjusted based on the other awards given out before the Tonys, of course).  Then it gets eerily quiet. Then "it" happens.  "It" seems to rear its head every year around this time. What is "it"?

Much chat and drama about what awards aren't given, but should be.  This year it was particularly noticeable, as this past season was one that fairly screamed for an award that is no longer to be given - the Special Event Tony.  Yes, other seasons might have been a stretch to even find nominees, but this year, there were enough to fill two ballots.  I suspect that award will be revisited...  (Vote in this weeks poll!)

One year, it was all about the "replacement actor" Tony.  And the committee caved, agreed to giving it, but set up some pretty impossible guidelines - the show had to have been running x time, the replacement must have played x performances before consideration, etc.  The idea was to keep shows from stunt casting to get awards - the "grab and go," if you will.  In other words, Betty Buckley in Sunset Boulevard, yes, 10 weeks of Brooke Shields in Chicago, no.  Still, the idea is a good one.

American Idiot

Over the years, there have been rallies for Best Original Song, Best Understudy (Male/Female/Play/Musical), and even Best Promotion (advertising).  The one that seems to be most consistent (beyond replacement actor) is the call for a Best Ensemble.  In fact, recently, Playbill Online ran a very good article on that very topic.  According to it, everyone seems to think it is a good idea, but no one can figure out how to make it happen.  Mainly, the reason is that, like "star quality," "ensemble" is something you know when you see it, but can't seem to define it.  They quibble, too, that it might "dilute the Tony brand,' i.e. you give out too many, they become worth less (bah humbug), and that some actors might prefer to be considered separately rather than share the glory (ego maniacs to the front of the line). 

Come Fly Away

I don't see any reason why a piece can't recognize the ensemble work of the cast as a whole while acknowledging that one or two roles might justifiably stick out some.  Case in point, The History Boys, a fine example of ensemble work if ever there was one.  They were, to a person, a solid unit, working as one to bring forth the fullest meaning of the text.  Still, you can't say that Richard Griffiths, Frances de la Tour (the teachers) and Samuel Barnett and Dominic Cooper (two of the students) - the first three Tony nominees, the first two winners - didn't do individually magnificent work, deserving of accolades by themselves, when the script and the storytelling called for it.  That year, I'd have awarded all 4 actors and the cast.

Lend Me a Tenor

Still, other plays have the whole cast at the same level throughout - witness God of CarnageThe entire cast was Tony nominated.  Why couldn't/shouldn't they have been given an outstanding ensemble award, too?  This year, two plays stick out to me as completely ensemble plays - Lend Me a Tenor, by the very virtue of the level of farce they are playing makes them an excellent ensemble, in spite of the billing, and despite whatever quibbles one may have with the script.  And Next Fall, which is a brilliant piece, and brilliantly acted.  But nary a nomination for any of the cast.  Why?  They have been universally lauded.  But the play and the story it tells give equal weight to all of the characters, and the play would suffer if even one piece were missing.  It would also suffer if one or two of the actors tried to make it a tour de force for themselves.  I'd give the Best Ensemble in a Play to either cast, maybe both.

Next Fall

And what about musicals?  They come - some of them - with an ensemble even labeled as such.  Imagine if you will, the nomination of the Jets over the Sharks in West Side Story.  But a case could be made for that show, that the cast, minus the lead roles is so integral to the story and the staging that they might just be a Best Ensemble candidate.  (A funny one might pit The Jets against Les Cagelles!) The exact same scenario is occurring this season over at American Idiot, take away the seven principals, and that show would be dead without its ensemble, so crucial they are to supporting the meaning and the principal cast.

Sondheim on Sondheim

Then you have musicals that are structured like The History BoysNext to Normal comes to mind.  Sure the individual performances are/were amazing, but they work together with such a completeness and unity.  Same with Hair, perhaps even more so.  You need the whole tribe, not just Berger and Claude, Hud and Sheila.  And this season, I think two musicals really fit the ensemble mode: Come Fly Away, and Sondheim on Sondheim, star billing not withstanding - and I think Barbara, Vanessa and Tom would agree that their "supporting cast" does as much for the evening as they do.

And so, my nominees for Best Ensemble in a Play are: Lend Me a Tenor and Next Fall.

And my nominees for Best Ensemble in a Musical are: American Idiot, Come Fly Away and Sondheim on Sondheim.

Come on, committee, what is two more awards, really?  And you'd really help anyone of those shows at the box office with a win, right?  And isn't that what it's all about?  Oh... that's for another blog...



Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

REVIEW: Next Fall

Review of the April 3 matinee performance at the Helen Hayes Theatre in New York City. Starring Patrick Breen, Maddie Corman, Jeremy Dugan, Patrich Heusinger, Connie Ray, and Cotter Smith.  A play by Geoffrey Nauffts.  Direction by Seryl Kaller. 2 hours, 20 minutes, including intermission.

If you ever want to start an argument in my house, bring up the existence of God. My late grandmother was a devout Baptist – not the extreme tent revival kind, the never miss a Sunday, teach Sunday school and bake for every single fundraiser kind. My dad, on the other hand, is a devout atheist quoting science over Biblical beliefs every chance he got. Her death a few years ago, and the accompanying weeping and wailing of her friends from the congregation, as well as their outpouring of support for him despite (or maybe because of) his lack of belief, has given him pause, and he like the rest of his immediate family is willing now to admit that there is the possibility that a Higher Power exists. His zeal with subsequent outer space and missing link discoveries is tempered with a healthy dose of humility and searching for “the other side of the argument.”

Patrick Heusinger and Patrick Breen

If you know anything about the new play, Next Fall, then you will understand from the paragraph above why I feel a very deep, personal connection to this play, which centers around a loving couple whose main bone of contention is whether or not God exists, and more importantly whether or not they will be able to join each other in the afterlife. It so happens that I can relate to the couple as a gay man, as the couple (Luke and Adam) is same-sex, Luke is my dream man’s 20-something age and I am Adam’s older age (an age that spells certain death in certain gay social circles). Further, I, like Luke, fought the inner struggle about how my religious beliefs fit my sexual desires, though I am not a fundamentalist Christian, and I, too, struggled for most of my life for parental approval, and spent far too long in the closet. And like Adam, I struggle with the whole God thing in general, satisfy myself with staying busy, clinging to my “fag hag” and enjoying the laughs I get with a few saucy barbs at cocktail parties.

But what I found most appealing about the play is the fact that it is way more universal than the characters (and my description thus far) might lead you to believe. Adam and Luke could just as easily be Adam and Sally, Sarah and Sally, or they could be same-sex roommates. The conflict between what we believe and whom we love is a struggle that can be found in any demographic, any religion, and any society on Earth, I’m sure. I’ve often written on this very blog that the now de rigueur inclusion of gay characters can often become tedious and so obvious. It is to playwright Geoffrey Nauffts’ credit that he uses stereotypes lightly and often with a sense of humor, and that he continually reaches for solid arguments on both sides of the many issues this play brings up.

Sean Dugan, Patrick Breen, Maddie Corman 

The play is a heady mix of delicious one-liners, situational comedy, and heartbreaking drama, soul-searching tragedy and, ultimately, an ending that poses as many questions as it does answers. Indeed, the final 10 minutes are among the most intense, emotional, funny and profoundly sad that I have experienced in a theatre. For that, I must credit the playwright, director Sheryl Krall, and the tightest ensemble of actors currently on the Broadway stage – including next to normal, the other quality gold standard of the Great White Way. Ms. Krall has directed this deceptively light, ultimately profound script with a nurturing hand and a keen sense of detail, down to the character-driven arrangement of the last waiting room magazines and careful arrangement of books on a shelf in a brand new apartment. She has created wonderfully rich relationships through deft staging and the juxtaposition of characters per scene. (The play unfolds in both real time and flashbacks.) We find out a lot about who these people are just by how they sit, look at each other, and behave during many Pinter-esque pauses. Visually, this is aided by the simple set, alternately a hospital waiting room, a New York rooftop, and a mid-town apartment, designed by Wilson Chin (set), Jess Goldstein (costumes) and Jeff Croiter (lighting).

At first sight, all of the characters seem to be cut and dry, black and white, almost to the point of discomfort – you ask yourself why do these people like each other? When you begin to realize that whether or not they like each other is the least of their complexities, you also start to realize that we have been carefully manipulated into seeing both sides of issues that before the show starts we probably would have had definite, finite ideas. And when it is all over, you’d have to be pretty numb from the shoulders up to not find your mind racing at all of the possibilities and counter arguments presented. You might even find yourself miffed that while the plot has a definite conclusion, the themes explored are decidedly left up in the air. Naufffts presents well thought out arguments on all sides of an issue and then leaves them there for you to decide. He makes very few judgment calls for you. Best of all, for folks who want to leave their plays in the theater, this play can be just as enjoyable and moving just at face value and nothing more.

Patrick Heusinger, Cotter Smith, Patrick Breen

Patrick Breen, Maddie Corman, Connie Ray

But no matter how well-written or directed, the play would be nothing without its aforementioned ensemble, all of who tread the difficult waters of taking sides in arguments about religion, self-awareness, sexuality and a variety of sub-issues. And to a person, they are perfectly cast and are a true ensemble, each giving and taking. There are no scenery chewers.

Sean Dugan has the most enigmatic (to me, anyway) role in the play. He is there from the first moment, and yet you know nothing about who he is or how he fits in this disjointed family until well into the second act, and when you do find out, it is amazing he stays. (I’m trying to avoid plot spoilers here.) And it is to Mr. Dugan’s credit that he maintains our interest in his character throughout the play, even if we might like him in the end a little less than we thought we might.

Connie Ray and Cotter Smith are Luke’s divorced parents – an interesting detail, considering that they are both fundamentalist Christians. Of course, in this play that also means they are more – he is a pompous, self-righteous, controlling bastard with a new trophy wife; she is a recovering pill-popper, dangerously close to slipping. The minute they reunite, you understand their prior marriage instantly; she is in constant clean up the mess mode, and he trounces through life like he is the God he professes to worship. Theirs is a very black and white, right and wrong world, despite the fact that both are decidedly shades of grey at best. Ms. Ray finds the balance between victim and trying to be strong mother very well, and her cathartic scene in act two is a highlight. Mr. Smith has the unenviable job of being a hateful bastard all while being likeable enough to believe his final moments on stage. Trust me, those moments are a doozy; the image created by Mr. Smith and a certain cast mate is stunning, heartfelt and devastating.

Maddie Corman, as the “fag hag” best friend of Luke and Adam, also has a deceptively difficult role to play. She is, as a fag hag would be, a sounding board for the boys, a tireless supporter and, of course, hilariously funny. In fact, Ms. Corman gets the lion’s share of the evening’s many sustained belly laughs. But she also has created a complex modern woman – one who fills the lonely void with her gay friends, multiple yoga groups and immersion into whatever the current urban trends for self-help are. I found myself thinking quite a bit about how her character would deal with the aftermath of the play’s events. Like everything else about the play, that could go one of several ways.

Patrick Heusinger and Patrick Breen

The central couple, Luke and Adam, is played by Patrick Heusinger and Patrick Breen, respectively, and their easy interplay with each other as actors makes their attraction and closeness completely believable even when their beliefs and actions should/could easily keep them apart. Both actors give easy, yet complex performances that are fine for their detail and for the broader ideas they represent. And both are superb in their roles. I’m sure there are many audience members who struggle with their attraction in the first place – Heusinger is young, buff, and extremely confident in that sexy way men like him are, while Breen is older, slight, self-conscious, and rather bookish. Add to that that their religious beliefs are polar opposites and that their arguments are deep and wounding and since neither will bend, you can’t help but wonder why they stay together. Luke won't bend out of fear of losing his faith or his patner; Adam won't bend out of fear of losing himself or his partner to something so big he can't fight it.  It cannot be simply the sex, which is only peripherally discussed, and the only time we see the two in bed together, one is curled up holding the comatose other. Oh, they show affection and are believable throughout, but it is a relief that we aren’t seeing their sexuality, actually. It would muddy the muddy waters.

Neither character is particularly sympathetic - both have their sweet moments and both are completely frustrating, making it difficult to choose sides. That is, it is difficult to choose until we reach, at the end of the play, the moment that started the whole thing to begin with. At that point, you find yourself forgiving both for their faults and resolutely rooting for them to survive. As my mother often says, “don’t let your last words to a loved one be hurtful words. You never know when, or if, you can make up for it.”

I haven’t seen enough of this season’s other plays to make any sweeping comparisons, but I can say that Next Fall is one of the most enjoyable and sad plays I’ve seen in a long time, played by an ideal cast. That it makes you really think is bonus. This play will really stay with you.

Grade: A+

(Photos by Carol Rosegg, except top, by Sarah Kulwich)

Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Off-Broadway: the New Out-of-Town Tryout

The Lucille Lortel Awards, which honors outstanding off-Broadway theater, announced its nominees for the 2009 -2010 season yesterday.  Three of the five outstanding musical nominees are headed for Broadway, either this season or next.  If those three actually make the leap (and it looks likely) and the other two musicals born off-Broadway recently announced for the Great White Way make it too, they will be joining several other shows who started life off the main stem, in small intimate theatres.


The Scottsboro Boys, Yank!, Everyday Rapture

Yes, this time next year we may have Yank!, Hedwig and the Angry Inch, The Scottsboro Boys, and bare among the Tony Award nominees.  And those shows will be joining next to normal, Hair, In the Heights, Next Fall, Fela!, and the last entry of this season, the recently announced Everyday Rapture on Broadway.  Pretty exciting for a lot of people.

It wasn't all that long ago that Broadway shows either tried their luck directly on Broadway or did an out of town tryout in places like Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC.  Then there were more and more regional theatre tryouts - places like Seattle, La Jolla, Chicago - all far away enough from the New York press.  Of course, the Internet and those damned bloggers (oops), changed all that, and reviews are instant, no matter the show, the venue or the current state of the production.  (For an interesting point of view on Bloggers and Show Reviews Prior to Opening, click here.) 


Avenue Q, In the Heights, Take Me Out

Regional tryouts and the occasional closer to home still happen, but more and more, Broadway is getting its newest hits from a closer neighbor - off-Broadway.  What used to be the norm is now completely the opposite.  And in a lot of ways, it makes sense.  First, you already have faced the scrutiny of the New York press and local theatregoers.  Second, you stand to lose a lot less money if you start smaller.  Third, New York-based actors and technicians can stay home, cutting huge hotel bills, and the same for carting scenery.  It has to be cheaper to lug stuff from Theatre Row or Greenwich to 45th Street than to haul it from from L.A.

And Broadway patrons are certainly benefiting.  As the theatre-going public's tastes change and become edgier, more modern fare is getting more and more attendance, off-Broadway makes sense as a place to get your next big hit.  Let's face it, Broadway has gotten more up to date, but off-Broadway is where the action really is if you want something with a little more to sink your teeth into.


Spring Awakening, [title of show], The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee

Just look at what has come to Broadway from off since the 2000 - 2001 season (I'm sure I'll miss a few, so forgive.  The point will still be made, I think.): Proof, A Class Act, Urinetown: The Musical, Topdog/Underdog, I'm Not Rappaport, Frankie and Johnny in the Claire de Lune, Take Me Out, Avenue Q, Little Shop of Horrors, Assassins, Caroline, or Change, Frozen, Hair, Steel Magnolias, The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, Doubt, Well, The Lieutenant of Inishmore, The Little Dog Laughed, Spring Awakening, Talk Radio, Sunday in the Park with George, Grease, Passing Strange, In the Heights, next to normal, [title of show], Slava's Snowshow, Oleanna, Fela! and Next Fall.

That is a lot of shows, isn't it?  And I'm pretty sure I missed a few...  Like I always say - the more the merrier!


Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Broadway Boys: Mr. April 2010

Spring has arrived (finally!) and Broadway is heating up with tons of second half shows opening (and closing).  One of the season's best-reviewed plays, Next Fall, brings with it a heaping helping of drama mixed with comedy, and a huge dose of Broadway Boy heat!

His name is Patrick Heusinger and he is making his straight play Broadway debut (his actual debut was in the most recent revival of Fiddler on the Roof), playing Luke, lover of Adam.  The show deals with faith and love, and it is definitely on my must-see list - in fact, I'm seeing it Saturday!  (Full review to follow!)

But to the matter at hand... 

Your Broadway Boy for April 2010 is Patrick Heusinger!

Patrick Heusinger


You may know him from TV's Gossip Girl...


... or the First National Tour of Monty Python's Spamalot...
(center in both)


... or Papermill's Godspell...



... or from the hit play Next Fall.
(left in both, with Patrick Breen)


No matter where you know him from, get to know him! 
His star is on the rise, for sure!

Don't you love how serious he is in his pictures?  Talented and good-looking is the perfect combination, smile or not!


Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com
Jeff

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

OUT: The Broadway issue

The April 2010 issue of Out magazine is pretty much what you'd typically expect from a magazine geared toward the gay community - lots of trendy ads for clothes, scents, "family friendly" vacation destinations, health and fitness, and sprinkled in, articles that run the gamut from political essay to celebrity interview to social trends and the arts.  But this month's issue is different in one key way for this blogger: almost all of the articles have to do with Broadway, with a little something for every gay/straight and theatre-loving reader.  You don't have to be queer to appreciate this issue; you have to be a fan of Broadway.

Oh, it isn't the perfect issue.  There is the typical, bitchy essay (page 62) on how Broadway isn't what it used to be - get this - it has become too commercial (really?), with producers more interested in the merchandizing possiblities beyone the stage production than they are the quality of the production.  Ok, maybe in "the good old days" there was less pressure to recoup.  But have things really changed?  There are just as many hits and just as many flops as ever - we just know the gorey details more readily via the Internet.  Does anyone who produced theatre really EXPECT a return on their investment?  Or is it more that they want to be a part of a project that they love with big ticket prestege?  Making money is nice, but more in the "cool!  I didn't expect it kind of way." 

And there is the little sidebar of Rock Musicals: Your guide to Gay Classics (page 40).  3 titles that loosely fit the rock musical genre, only one of which has anything to do with the gay experience.  No RENT, no Spring Awakening, no Hair.  They chose the off-Broadway cast recording of Godspell, the off-Broadway cast recording of Little Shop of Horrors, and the off-Broadway cast recording of Hedwig and the Angry Inch.  Only the final title seems relevant to both the genre and the sub-genre they picked.  Godspell and not Jesus Christ Superstar?  Little Shop of Horrors, really?  Of course, the real bottom line here is: what gay man isn't aware of at least 10 titles better suited to this than what was chosen?  Please...

But the highlights far outweight these two little piffles.  Your $5.99 gets you some really good stuff:


  • page 6: A cute photograph of Wesley Taylor that teases a future article - see below.

  • page 25 - 26: A nice article about playing gay with Next Fall's Patrick Heusinger (a couple of nice photos, too.)

  • page 31: A one-pager on style, based on choices by twin brothers and Broadway designers (Promises, Promises) Scott and Bruce Pask.

  • page 34: A one-pager on what to do that isn't too touristy in Times Square (including eating at my beloved Edison Cafe)

Valerie Harper as Rhoda Morgenstern

  • page 43: A one-pager column called "Girlfriend" with guest gal pal, Valerie Harper, currently starring in Looped.  She offers advice to gay guys in a piece titled, "Can I Be Blunt?"  I'll leave it at that.  (above)
  • page 49: An op-ed piece about religion and gay marriage by Tony winner Alan Cumming.
  • page 52: An adorable pictorial spread featuring the dogs of Broadway celebrities, dressed as famous Broadway characters.  The precious pups of Gavin Creel, Kristin Chenoweth and others are part of this funny and sweet photo shoot. (below)

Zora Jackson (Cheyenne's pup) as Little Edie in Grey Gardens

  • page 58:  An interview (more than candid, bordering on, to use his own words, "being an asshole") with Arthur Laurents, who dishes on his disdain for the original cast of the West Side Story revival, his love for the newer cast members,  La Cage aux Folles, Stephen Sondheim, being in the army, and who his favorite Gypsy star is.  If catty, witty and unnecessarily sharp barbs are for you, this will be a feast; if you are willing to wade through it, he offers a perspective only a very few people can.
  • page 64:  The sidebar, "Ten Out-of-the-Box Musicals," offers a history of the musical as controversy maker, from Show Boat to Passing Strange.  Just a reminder that some day, probably soon, Spring Awakening will seem quaint.
  • page 66: A sexy photo collage featuring the boys of Fela!
  • page 68:  A poignant essay about life 20 years after Angels in America.  Time flies when not much changes.
  • page 72:  The cover story about Billie Joe Armstrong of Green Day and American Idiot fame.  Being that it is Out magazine, there is some discussion of the media fixation over his sexual orientation, but the majority of the piece is about how he and the band play a role in the creation of the Broadway musical based on their work.  Most appropriately, he recognizes that the crafting of a theatre piece out of their songs and lyrics adds a legitimacy and weight to their value as more than "pop music."
  • page 80:  And what would Out magazine be without a lot of hot guy pictures (aside from the underwear ads and the Macy's spread, which looks nothing like what we get here in Vermont...).  This month, fittingly enough, the spread is called "Prints Charming" and it features three of Broadway's hottest (in all senses of the word) stars: Wesley Taylor (The Addams Family),  Kyle Dean Massey(next to normal) and Tom Lenk (who just left Rock of Ages).  Who knew prints could be so sexy?  And the pages featuring Kyle Dean in particular are not work friendly!  Click HERE for a link to those pics, plus a nifty video of the photo shoot itself.
About as gay as everything that Broadway is anyway, I think theater fans in general will appreciate this issue.  Sure it has a gay slant, but it is well-written, thought provoking and a little more "real" than the Playbill you'll get at a show.


Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Bits and Pieces for 03.07.10

Hope you had a great week!    Don't forget to vote in this month's poll!  Jeff

WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED

Broadway Boys: Mr. March
REVIEW: Yank!
February Poll Results
Looking Forward to Spring
Broadway Crossword II: The Divas, Part 1
RANT: Ticketmaster Troubles

ET TU, MIRACLE WORKER?


With Friday's ominous, if honest, statement from the producers of The Miracle Worker that if ticket sales don't improve substantially, they'd have to consider closing, I have to ask myself a rather pointed question: Am I a jinx to Broadway revivals?  Look at my track record: Tried to buy tickets for Brighton Beach Memoirs, but it closed the next day.  Had tickets for Ragtime, announced closing, extended, and still I was a week too late.  Then there's Finian's Rainbow, I didn't like it, but the critics raved.  I saw it, and it closed shortly thereafter.  Saw Bye Bye Birdie.  We all know how that turned out.

On the plus side, A Little Night Music is doing well a full two months after I saw it.  And the future looks, well, promising for Promises, Promises.  But I've already started praying, just in case, that it makes it to Memorial Day weekend.  And I'm really hedging my bets on La Cage aux Folles - I'm seeing that in previews...

NY TIMES ARTICLES: COME FLY AWAY AND NEXT FALL


Of the new shows coming up this spring, I have tickets to a preview of Come Fly Away  (just in case - I'll be blogging my review the day after the show opens, since I'm seeing a preview), and Next Fall for a few weeks after opening - my thinking is that it is already critically-acclaimed and Elton wouldn't let me down.

Recently, The New York Times had articles on both shows.  One is a short piece on "must see" actors David Breen and David Heusinger  of Next Fall.  The other is a pretty lengthy article about Twyla Tharp  and the genesis of Come Fly Away.  That article is of particular interest because it delves into her feelings about The Times They Are A-Changin', and it discusses the fact that there is most definitely a plot to each pairing of charcaters in Come Fly Away. 

I point this out because the nabobs of a certain other Broadway site that allows reader commentary threads are complaining that the show is plotless and can't understand why there is no talking in it.  Um, duh.  It is a dance musical, where the dancing and the lyrics tell the story of the show, like Movin' Out.

Anyway, click the above links.  I think you'll find the info interesting.

MORE YANK!


Good news!  You have at least two more weeks of performances to catch of Yank!, the terrific new musical playing at the York Theatre Company on Lexington Avenue.  It features star turns by Nancy Anderson, Ivan Hernandez, Jeffry Denman and Mr. March himself, cutie patootie Bobby Steggert.  There is a lot of really cool stuff on the show's website, too.  Check it out at http://www.yankthemusical.com/.  And go see the show!  (Click above to see my review!)

BROADWAY BY THE NUMBERS


0 = The number of Tony-winning Billys left in Billy Elliot.  After this evening's performance, when the amazing Trent Kowalik takes his final (and, I'm sure, tearful) bow, all three will have said goodbye to Broadway.  Let's hope Mr. Kowalik comes back again and soon!

3 = The number of Broadway shows that have re-opened off-Broadway.  First, there was Avenue Q, then The 39 Steps, and now (several years later) Defending the Caveman.  It plays at Sophia's Downstairs in the Hotel Edison (next to the Lunt-Fontanne).

1:1 = Goodbye and good luck in London, original revival tribe of Hair, who leaves after today's performance for the West End.  And that means welcome and good luck on Broadway, new revival tribe of Hair.  We trade nice guy Gavin Creel for the charming Kyle Riabko, the sexy Will Swensen for the equally sexy (I might just have to back and see this guy live) Ace Young

Happy Birthday Last Week to:

2/28: Bernadette Peters
3/1: Kevin McCollum
3/2: Theodor Seuss Geisel
3/3: Christopher Body
3/4: Romain Fruge (right)
3/5: Elaine Page
3/6: Stephen Schwartz





Comments?  Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...