Showing posts with label Content of Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Content of Blog. Show all posts

Friday, August 30, 2013

Happy 4th Birthday, JK's TheatreScene! (Year 5 Begins!)


Time sure flies when you are having fun!  Hard to believe it was FOUR years ago that I started this blog... It has been a lot of fun... and a lot of work.  Regular readers might have noticed that I don't do weekends anymore (don't worry...when it gets busy again, I'll write every day if necessary).

But 5 days a week going into year 5 doesn't mean you'll lose much.  I promise.

Here's what I hope to bring you this year - and please feel free to suggest other ideas!



More coverage of regional theatres... Coming Soon: My review of Signature Theater's (Virginia) Miss Saigon and DC's Shakespeare Theatre's A Funny Thing Happened...

More coverage of National Tours and Pre-Broadway Shows... Coming Soon: More American Idiot... If/Then in DC, PLUS The Kennedy Center's Side Show

And, of course, lots of Broadway coverage, including more plays and every new musical of the season!  Coming Soon: Big Fish, The Glass Menagerie, A Time to Kill, Twelfth Night, PLUS off-Broadway's Little Miss Sunshine



PLUS: My day on the line at The Book of Mormon, my day at the Broadway Flea Market and Pippin: the last performance of Tony-winner Andrea Martin

More media reviews: CD's, books, and websites!

AND MORE OF WHAT YOU TELL ME YOU LOVE: Face of the Future, Mr and Ms Broadway, Broadway Openings: 10, 20, and 30 Years Ago, JK's TheatreChatYear 2 of HOT or NOT! ... and MORE CONTESTS! (A new one starts MONDAY!)

Thanks for reading!

Jeff
5.001

Thursday, August 30, 2012

4th Smash Year! (My Blog Turns 3...)

Three years ago today, I Googled "blog template," came across this really easy and very flexible blogging program.  I wanted to see if I could bring together my two loves: writing and theatre.  And then I wondered if what I had to say would mean anything to anyone besides me!  Well, 1,102 blogs later, I'm still here (intentional Follies reference)!  And I am so grateful that others find what I have to say interesting enough to make this all worthwhile.

So, before I go any further, I want to thank all of you for coming back day after day, and for all of your input and support.

Over the coming year, I am looking forward to sharing..
.





  • ...more reviews -Broadway, Off-Broadway, regional and National Tours.  This past year, I really enjoyed bringing you my thoughts on every new musical and musical revival to open on Broadway last season, plus several plays, including all 4 Tony nominees for Best Play.  And there were several off-Broadway shows, the New York Musical Theatre Festival, regional productions from Philadelphia, Boston, Washington, DC, and Baltimore.  (I did see one Off-Off-Broadway show, but I just couldn't bring myself to write about it...)

  • ...more media reviews - theatre books, CDs, and DVDs.  Thanks to my friends at Broadway Records, it was cool to bring you reviews of the cast recordings of Bonnie and Clyde, Lysistrata Jones and the Nick Jonas EP of How to Succeed..., and Applause Books brought you the Spring Awakening lyrics study.





  • ...more interviews - thanks to Claybourne Elder, Lindsay Nicole Chambers, Josh Segarra, Derek Klena for in-depth interviews, and my two buddies Alex Wyse and Teddy Toye, who are kind enough to check in regularly from their journeys to Broadway stardom.  Coming up very soon, I've got an interview with star of Godspell and Broadway-bound Allegiance star Telly Leung, more with Teddy and Alex, and I'm working on interviews with a current Broadway fan favorite and a Tony-winning Broadway legend (I can't tell you who yet)!





  • ...more interactive stuff - monthly theatre polls, "HOT/HOTTER" contests for each new musical this season, games and puzzles, and the 3rd annual JKTS Awards!
  • ...more contests - tickets to some of Broadway's biggest plays and musicals, and maybe even some special show memorabilia (again, I can't tell you more yet)!


Of course, this blog is ever-changing.  So PLEASE keep writing, Tweeting and letting me know what you want to see (and what you don't) and I'll do my best to bring it to you!


Lastly, I'd like to thank Andrew Keenan-Bolger, Ben Fankhauser, Max Von Essen, Curtis Holbrook, Kara Lindsay and Betty Buckley for your help and input with the Mr and Ms Broadway feature and support with ideas and pictures and other stuff that has made this blog even better than ever!

Special thanks to the Fansies Alliance - every Broadway show should be so lucky to have such intense and loyal fans as Newsies does.

And, finally extra-special thanks to Esther and Tyler, my two best Twitter buddies, and my best editor, theatre companion and friend, Mike.

Here's to another great year!


BEFORE YOU GO, HAVE YOU...
  • ...VOTED IN THIS WEEK'S HOT/HOTTER?  CLICK HERE FOR THE DOGFIGHT EDITION! THE POLL CLOSES AT 8PM TONIGHT!
  • ...VOTED IN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL?  SCROLL DOWN AS YOU READ TODAY'S BLOG!  IT'LL BE ON YOUR LEFT! YOU'VE GOT TODAY AND TOMORROW!

Jeff
4.001
Comments? Questions? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (Email); or leave a comment below and check a box!

Thursday, August 23, 2012

BLOGJACK: Actors Replaced Mid-Show


  • HAVE YOU...EMAILED ME WITH QUESTIONS FOR MY INTERVIEW WITH GODSPELL AND ALLEGIANCE'S TELLY LEUNG?  SEND THEM TO ME AT jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com BY FRIDAY, AUGUST 24!
  • HAVE YOU...VOTED IN ROUND 2 OF THE "HOT/HOTTER" BRING IT ON EDITION?  YOU HAVE UNTIL THURSDAY, AUGUST 23RD AT 8 PM!  CLICK THE SHOW LOGO TO YOUR LEFT!
  • HAVE YOU...TAKEN THIS MONTH'S THEATRE POLL? SCROLL DOWN A LITTLE AND LOOK OVER TO YOUR LEFT!

The other day, I was looking through some pictures on BroadwayWorld.com, and the Message Board list caught my eye.  Tried as I might, I couldn't resist clicking on one of the topics: "Have you ever been at a show where someone had to leave mid-show?"  I couldn't tell if it meant audience members getting up and leaving, or if it meant performers leaving mid-show.  I have experienced both, and though I hoped it meant the latter (I love live theatre stories like that - you don't get that at the movies); I knew if it was the former, I'd probably get a few laughs (bitchy stories of hating a show everyone else adores, tales of rude behavior, reactions of the house staff, etc. are always a good read...).  As it turns out, the original poster meant performers, not audience members, but the thread was full of both kinds of stories.  I was thoroughly entertained.

So I thought that today, I'd write about my experiences with that.  On my own blog, I can write what I want, and not be crucified for having an original opinion or be dismissed for "being too new to posting."  How elitist!  But I digress.

I was sure someone would mention the more famous ones - Idina Menzel falling through a trap door at Wicked and, I think, Eden Espinoza finishing the show.  Or the "big fall" at Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark, which stopped the show completely.  They were there.  But I have to admit I was SHOCKED to find out that it happens so much at Wicked that fans have a name for it - "the witch switch!"

As for myself, I've seen some pretty interesting switcheroos.  In fact, I don't think I've ever seen a performance of Cats where the entire cast that started the show was the same one at the curtain call.  Dance injuries were plentiful for the felines.  The third time I saw it on Broadway (don't judge me), 3 performers changed at intermission - and I don't mean a chain reaction caused by one actor leaving - 3 separate roles!


The most famous Broadway injury of all was played out thousands of times in A Chorus Line, when Paul, who just poured out his heart and soul, re-injures his knee, and has to be carted off to the hospital.  When they line up one last time, and Morales leaves a space where Paul was, I bet that hit home for many a dancer.  But in the dozens of times I've seen that show, quite a few had some mid-show switches.  I remember one in particular.  The actor playing Mike was really going full blast with "That I Can Do" when he started to do his slide across the stage and ended up getting caught on something and doing a very awkward split.  He literally screamed in pain and the entire cast and audience gasped as one.  Zach ran up on the stage, and they improvised a scene to get Mike back in place and to assess the damage.  The trouper finished his bit, stood there in line for what must have felt an eternity, and finally got to leave the stage during "Hello, Twelve." At the end of that number, when they all go back to the line, we in the audience, finally realized that a "new" Mike was on the line, and Mike (old and new) got a spontaneous round of applause!


But my favorite experience with such a switch happened at Avenue Q.  Not that I wish any performers ill, but I hope that if /when it happens to other performers, the transition can be a smooth and professional as what happened one day at the Golden Theatre.  There I was, in the 3rd row, watching intently.  I was really enjoying Barrett Foa as Princeton and Rod - he's a terrific singer and his voices were a riot.  But being that close, as you probably know, allows you to sometimes see details you don't necessarily want to see.  I noticed that Mr. Foa's t-shirt was gaining some pretty serious wet patches of sweat.  "No big deal," I remember thinking, "they do A LOT of running around."  But then, as the act continued, more and more of his shirt was darkening, and I saw that he was getting pretty pale - and he's pretty fair-skinned to begin with. It was really obvious that he wasn't feeling all that good, though I can not stress enough that his performance was top-notch, and I'm pretty sure not many people around me even noticed.

Well, we get to the scene right before "Mix Tape," and Foa, as Princeton, comes into Kate Monster's place. He gets to the line about needing to use the bathroom and exits.  When Princeton came back out of "the bathroom," it wasn't with the soon-to-be NCIS:LA star.  It was with Howie Michael Smith, who was just as excellent.  They never missed a beat.  And they never announced the change verbally, though I'm sure there was a sign posted outside in the lobby.  I know for sure that the majority of the audience didn't realize two actors played the same role that day since the people around me up close to the stage were oblivious to the change.  Not ONE person mentioned it at intermission!  Sure it was pretty slick and definitely painless (except for poor Barrett Foa) for the audience.  But I have to applaud the entire company... they were the very definition of professional.


Jeff
3.359
Question?  Something to say? @jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (email); or check a box and leave a "Comment" below (Blogger)

Sunday, May 20, 2012

1,000th Blog!: Thank you!

THE 2ND NOMINATIONS BALLOT FOR THE JKTS AWARDS 
CLOSES TODAY AT 8PM!
CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR NOMINATIONS!

Well, two and half years ago, when I started this blog, I was really doing it mostly for me as an outlet to write about theater.  And in the beginning, it really was mostly me - I'd get 5 or 6 hits a day, and I admit it was a thrill.  It is hard to imagine that now, most days, I get 1,000 or more!

My favorite pictorial subject:
Charlie Williams!

During our time together, I've learned what works and what doesn't.  And I've learned that I have two groups of readers, though I am certain there is overlap.  There is the group that reads anything and everything to do with Broadway Boys and Ladies (including Broadway Bares, and the ridiculous, but popular "HOT/HOTTER" tournament.  The other group seems to be the more studious theater-goer, who reads my reviews, my history pieces and my analysis of show art, logos and commercials.  I'm glad to be able to appeal to and satisfy such a wide range of theater fan!

My favorite show:
next to normal

I probably would keep doing this even if it was only for me because I love the outlet.  But it sure is nice to share it with you.

Over the last 1,000 blogs, I've met and worked with a lot of people.  And I'd like to thank you!


  • My fellow bloggers and Twitter friends: Esther, Tyler, Jonathan, Chris, and dozens more who stay in contact on and off!
  • My Broadway friends who have been so gracious with their time, thoughts and photos: Kristin Chenoweth, Curtis Holbrook, Betty Buckley, Jeff Calhoun, Alex Wyse, Teddy Toye, Josh Segarra, Lindsay Nicole Chapman,  and others.
  • The folks at Broadway Records and Applause Books who send me stuff to review and share with you.
  • Everyone at Serino Coyne and MCC Theatre for their generosity in ticket giveaways for you!
  • All of you (including several anonymous parents of Broadway babies) who email me and share your opinions, thoughts and thanks.
  • And to the Broadway companies of next to normal and Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark for giving me the most to write about these past 1,000 days (with 58 and 80 blogs each, respectively).
  • And, finally, to my best theatre loving friend and editor (and frequent contributor), Mike.  I couldn't have done this without your help, support, and honesty.

My most written on subject:
Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark

I am now going to celebrate this achievement, by going down south to see Mike and take in Xanadu at Signature Theatre in Virginia!

Best regards to all of you!
Jeff

P.S.: Please be sure to make your nominations for the 2nd Annual JKTS Awards!  Ballot 2 closes tonight at 8PM, and the final ballot goes live tomorrow at 9AM!

P.P.S.:  I leave you with a fun video made by the London Cast of Ghost The Musical.  Enjoy those abs!




Jeff
3.262
@jkstheatrescene (Twitter); jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com (email); Comment below (Blogger)

Saturday, November 12, 2011

JK'S THEATRESCENE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

The Ghostlight at the Godspeed Opera House in Connecticut
Can you guess what show the stage is set for? (Click on the photo to enlarge)
I'm turning on the ghostlight for the day, so that I can work on making this blog even more user friendly.

Look for:
  • easier navigation with quick links on the sides of the text!
  • more page tabs to get to reviews, Broadway Boys and Girls, history, flops and more!
  • links to show websites!
  • links to theatre websites!
  • links to the best theatre blogs around!

Have a great weekend!

Jeff
3.075

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Year 3, Day 1

Please forgive the following exercise in self-indulgence...

If I were a Broadway producer, today would be the day I add "3rd Smash Hit Year!" to all of my advertisements!

Two years ago today, I sat at this very computer and started writing about something I love... theatre.  That day, I had no idea of the magnitude of what I was getting into.  That there are thousands of people out there who love the arts as much as I do; that so many of us write about it.  What a great discovery!

I have learned so much not only about theatre, but about myself.  And for that, I thank all of you who read this little piece of the blogosphere, regularly or when the content suits you.  Whether you stop by every day or once in awhile, I appreciate your taking the time. 

This time last year, I made three wishes for the year just past:

1. That I can continue to work on making this the best blog I can make it be.  I think I have made the quality of this blog better than ever, with plenty of room for improvement.  I hope I can continue to bring you all of the things you have come to expect and to make room for the things you would like to read about.  I look forward to more Broadway Boys and Ladies (your favorites), show reviews, and series.  And I hope to add more about regional theatre, national tours, and make better use of Twitter!

2. That more of you will share experiences and thoughts about my blog entries and theatre in general. PLEASE WRITE IN!  Well, you certainly made that wish come true!  Thank you all for your comments, feedback, emails and Tweets!  And thank you to all of you who contribute by sending in your favorite quotes from shows, your personal experiences at the same shows I see, and your contributions of reviews.  I also listen to your suggestions.



3. That all of us have the privilege and ability to see great theatre at any venue we are lucky enough to get to!  Boy, have I been lucky this year!  Every new musical that opened on Broadway last season... a couple of trips to the D.C. area to see regional theatre (Chess at Signature Theatre), the Kennedy Center (the National Tour of next to normal), and even a few National Touring shows.  I have also had the privilege of seeing some interesting local theatre (I never write about neighbors).  Goal met!  Of course, is there any way to see everything?  No way!  And so, I continue to expand! 
So what is ahead for JK's TheatreScene?  Well, as I said, I listen to you!  After all, you are who I do this for... so:



  • More reviews of shows that are off-Broadway and beyond.  In fact, I have tickets for a few shows off-Broadway - The Submission at MCC, and tickets to TWO New York Musical Theatre Festival Shows.  And there is Carrie...
  • More blogs about theatre legends... Who knew so many of you love Bob Fosse as much as I do?  Look for stuff about Carol Channing, Boris Aaronson and Michael Bennett this fall...
  • And, yes, I will do more series about landmark shows AND flops (your response to Grind, Part I has been very encouraging).

  • Look for more what you like: Broadway Boys, Girls and games. I promise I will do another crossword puzzle, soon! And, yes, more jigsaw puzzles! (If you only knew how easy those are to do!)
  • And less about Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark (I will be reviewing the CD shortly, though), Stephen Sondheim, and no more Jeopardy! games.  I will do my best, but it will be difficult to talk  about Follies without talking Sondheim, and who knows what media blitz Spider-Man will come up with next?  So I can only promise that I will only write about them when they are newsworthy only.  Fair enough? 
Again, thank you all!
Jeff
P.S.: For my most ardent fans: The third Broadway show I walked out on at intermission was...  the revival A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum starring Nathan Lane.  He was NOT the reason why I left.  Stay tuned for the blog about THAT eventful day...
3.001

Thursday, July 7, 2011

BROADWAY BLOG: Day By Day: The Godspell Blog

When it comes to other theatre blogs, I'm pretty choosy about the ones I follow.  You'll notice that there is a list of just 8 that I follow closely to your right.  You'd think there would be more, considering how many of us there are out there.  But very few fit my simple criteria: knowledge about theatre, the ability to express an opinion with back up (whether I agree or not!), and an overall passion for whatever the topic at hand is.

Ken Davenport

One of the blogs I love is written by a New York theatre producer, Ken Davenport, the man behind such Broadway shows as Oleanna and the upcoming revivals of A Few Good Men and Godspell.  He tells it like it is, has a sense of humor about it, and is completely practical.  He is also behind the most recent addition to my blog following list, a blog devoted to the behind-the-scenes details of bringing Godspell to its first preview on Broadway, October 13, 2011.

The Godspell Logo

The occasion was the 100th day prior to that first preview, and Mr. Davenport decided to launch a separate blog to allow theatre fans a chance to see what it takes to bring a show in.  He promises 100 days of decision-making, insider information, and lots of how-to.  Today will be day 98 - it started Tuesday.  In the two days so far, he's introduced the advertising/promotions team, who decided about a huge Times Square billboard (it'll be near The Phantom of the Opera), and talked about the minute decisions he faces in choosing a t-shirt maker and merchandiser.  It may or may not sound all that glamorous to you, but as a lover of all things theatre, I am enticed by the idea of learning from someone who actually DOES theatre!  At the very least, I'll gain an appreciation for all those hundreds of small decisions that are made before anyone even steps foot in the Circle in the Square Theatre for the first Broadway preview of Godspell.

To find out all about this new blog, click HERE.
To find out about Davenport's regular blog, click HERE.

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.313

Friday, January 28, 2011

Ask Jeff: A Really Good Question

Hi, everyone!  I got a really good question from a reader yesterday, which I am going to answer, but I'd also like to hear from you on this question.

Jeff,

You've mentioned several times in your blog that you are seeing Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark again, and also have talked about seeing next to normal several times.  Besides it costing a lot of money, why do you like seeing shows more than once, and sometimes much more than twice?

Curious and envious,
Teri C.
Columbus, OH

Well, Teri C. that is an interesting question.  One that I have given some thought to lately, in particular with regards to Spider-Man and Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown, and the recently closed next to normal.  I think my multiple trips to shows can be categorized into three groups:

Hairspray: A personal favorite and a great "first show"

A. Taking friends and theatre newbies: This used to happen much more than it does now, but many times, I'll go to a show a second (or third or more) time because a friend will have an extra ticket to a show he/she knows I like.  Sometimes, I'm the "Bobby-baby-Bobby" who takes the wife of a friend to the show because the husband isn't interested.  (I'm gay and they realize I am no threat, plus they are relieved to not have to go!)  And many times, I'll go a specific show that I know would be a great starting point for friends who are just getting their feet wet with going to plays and musicals.  My sister and I, for example, saw both The Full Monty and Hairspray together because I felt pretty safe that she'd get the humor and sweetness of both, and you really can't beat male strippers and moms in drag!  It is funny that while she doesn't go with me often - we don't live close together and she has two small children - we have still managed to see 5 different productions of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat!  (It is her absolute favorite.)

Passion: From Snooze to Thrilling

B.  Some shows are complicated and really need to be seen more than once to really absorb them:  I find all of Sondheim's musicals to be in this category - even shows I've seen before, because each director has a new take on it.  Passion is a show that DEFINITELY fits this category.  I saw a late preview of it.  I HATED IT.  I mean HATED it.  BUT I knew that it was a Sondheim show and that you can't even scratch the surface of understanding, let alone deeper meaning on one viewing.  So I dutifully purchased a second ticket and saw it right after it opened.  A world of difference!  I didn't love it, but I didn't hate it.  I knew what I was in for, and what to look for and what I could pay less attention to and more attention to, etc.  I ended up seeing Passion 7 or 8 times.  I often joke that I kept the show running a week longer.  (There are only two other composers that I, without even thinking about it, will give a second chance viewing to no matter what: Michael John Lachuisa and Adam Guettel.)  Both Spider-Man and Women on the Verge fall into this category.  The former because I have to see what they fixed, and I have a feeling there is much more to it, just that the special effects overwhelm the content; the latter because I wanted to see the end result, and because I think they were so close to something awesome.

John Doyle's direction of this Company
really needed more than one viewing to
take in the sheer brilliance of the concept.

Women on the Verge: Were they on the verge of making
it all make more sense?  More funny?  More meaningful?

C.  They strike a chord in me and I love them so much I have to see them again and again:  Now mind you, I will never be one of those fans that sees every single performance of a show, or one of those obsessed ones that honestly believes that the cast will miss them if they aren't in Row A, Seat 1 at every Saturday matinee.  I have been the kind of fan of a show that I go back to see replacements or specific understudies (both A Little Night Music and next to normal fit in this category).  Over the years I have had several of those: The Mystery of Edwin Drood, A Chorus Line, Sweeney Todd, West Side Story to name a few. 




A Chorus Line, Drood, West Side Story:
I just can't get enough!


It is this last category that even some of my friends think is odd.  But I always say, "Don't you have favorite movies that you watch over and over?"  "Yes," they always say and launch into a list.  Well a show is the same thing for me.  The difference is that most shows aren't on DVD so I can't just buy it and watch it over and over that way.  And don't get me started on movie versions of musicals.

An embarrassing sub-category - I won't publicly disclose how many times I've seen Cats and Les Miserables.  Both shows I'm not even sure I can say I like anymore...


J. Robert, Alice, Jason and Marin all brought so much to next to normal,
I wouldn't have missed any of them for the world

The most recent show that I have seen 5 or more times is next to normal.  That show fits all 3 categories.  And there are several shows I regret not getting to more than once: The Scottsboro Boys being the most recent. I will likely get to see many productions of both in the years to come.  In the mean time, I have the cast recordings to take me away and to ponder.

Thanks for writing, Teri, and for letting me share with everyone!

Now it is your turn!  What shows have you seen many times?  Why?  What shows to you wish you had seen more than once?  Write in and tell me.  (If you don't want your response blogged, tell me that, too and I won't share.)  Am I the only odd ball out there who sees shows over and over, and every different production I can get to?



Answer here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com, or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.150

Saturday, January 22, 2011

BLOGJACK: The Dramatists Guild Fund's Legacy Project

Yesterday, during my ritual of hitting all the major theatre websites and blogs, I came across an entry from Playbill.com's "Play Blog" about a fascinating new interview series.  It is called The Legacy Project and it is produced by the Dramatists Guild Fund.  In the series of 10 interviews, modern masters like David Zippel, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Brian Yorkey interview true legends of theatre - playwrights like Edward Albee, and composer/lyricists like Stephen Sondheim, Bock and Harnick, and John Kander.  Underscoring the importance of such a series is the noticeable absence of Fred Ebb, and the presence of recently deceased Joesph Stein, among others.  Apparently more are planned as everything about the current set indicates that it Volume 1.

Unfortunately, upon further investigation at http://www.dramatistsguildfund.org/, I found that the entire series is only available at colleges and universities with performing arts majors.  Understandable, of course - and I hope you college kids get to use this invaluable resource - but disappointing for theatre enthusiasts beyond their college years!

Still, even the 2 or 3 minute samples of each are interesting and insightful.  Notice the gleam in the eyes of the younger set as they prepare to meet their lifetime idols!  That even comes across in this introduction to the series:



To whet your appetite, I also thought I'd post this most interesting snippet of the Arthur Laurents interview.  The notoriously crabby genius shows a surprising side to himself and a pretty nice self-deprecating wit.



To see all of these gems, The Dramatists Guild Fund has their own channel on YouTube.


Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.144

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

What If Football Fans Were Like Broadway Fans?

Last week, I sort of tongue-in-cheek asked the opposite of today's question, marvelling at the fervor and accoutrement of fans of the gridiron, and wondering how it would be if fans of Broadway had that kind of stuff and passion.  Little did I know, that less than a week later, I'd find out the answer to the very opposite of my question!

Yes, this past Sunday afternoon, a series of very serendipitous events conspired to find me in the very front row - a floor seat the ticket says - at the Circle in the Square Theatre for a performance of Lombardi (Read yesterday's review to see what I thought of the show).  It was a half hour until curtain when I arrived and joined the excited (an much louder than usual) crowd lined up to get tickets scanned and take the escalator down to the theatre in the round.  As I descended, I began to notice that the entire lobby was decorated much like a museum exhibit.  Giant, iconic photographs of the subject, Vince Lombardi, adorned several walls and the enormous pillars that hold the building up.  Along the walls going down with the escalator were large quotes spoken by the man, each football-specific and pointedly universal.  Someone had done their homework, I thought. 

As I turned to face the room after getting off the moving stairs, there was an electricity in the room that one very rarely feels outside a Broadway show.  And I don't think it was all because the lobby had been transformed into an actual museum exhibit, courtesy of the National Football League!  It struck me at that very moment that this audience was unlike any other I had ever been in.  Men, dozens, hundreds, outnumbering the women probably 3 to 1, and every one of them grinning madly, and letting out squeals (yes, squeals) of delight as they discovered treasure after treasure - real 1960's Green Bay Packers uniforms, photos of long ago heroes, and the centerpiece of all the commotion: the ACTUAL Lombardi Trophy that the winners of the Super Bowl receive, along with an actual Super Bowl ring were in display, and these gentlemen couldn't have been more excited and honored to be in its presence.  Each took turns being photographed with the trophy.  It reminded me of the time I saw an actual Tony Award in a glass display case.  I said the same things these guys were saying: "Can you believe that that is the actual trophy?"  "Wow!  It looks so much bigger on TV!"  "It may be small, but that's the f'ing Lombardi Trophy!"


It was then that it hit me.  Like a ton of bricks.  Football fans and Broadway fans ARE like each other.  One man's Super Bowl ring is another's collectible Opening Night Playbill. One man's old-school football jersey - wool with satin numbers - is another's "One" hat from A Chorus Line, both valuables carefully stored behind glass.  And the sheer reverence for the event is exactly the same as the excited expectation as waiting to see a brand new show for the very first time.

But fate wasn't done with me yet.  I entered the theatre behind a group of very excited men, all about my age, each in authentic Green Bay Packers jerseys.  And each had the same reaction as they rounded the corner and saw the space for the first time: "Holy shit!  It looks just like a freakin' football stadium!"  They were right, of course, and I felt just a bit out of my own element.  Man, were they excited.  And then, as one they became as quite as church mice when the usher asked for their tickets and handed them Playbills ("Here, Joe, take a book, already!").  As it turns out they were in the same "end zone" as me, but just to my left, so that I could see them staring, pointing things out, and looking just a bit unsure.  It was pretty clear that these guys, like many in the theatre that afternoon were there at their very first Broadway show. 

For about 5 minutes I sat alone in my two seat row, and I took in the various people.  Many groups of men sitting together unable to hide both their unsure discomfort and their excitement.  There were lots of women, too, talking football AND theatre etiquette, clearly enjoying this rare opportunity to share worlds collided.  And, perhaps best of all, there were several father/young son pairs - the future of both Broadway and NFL audiences.

Then I was joined by a rather large guy (and I am not exactly tiny), who looked rather uncomfortable and alone. "Um, I think that is my seat."  "Sure, let me get up."  I stood and we both laughed.  How were we going to fit?  But we managed.  That laugh broke the ice, and the conversation went something like this:

"So..uh... is this your first time at a show?"

"No!  I go to shows all the time." I note his look of disappointment, and go on, "but I've never been to one about football before."

Look of relief. "Oh!  Man, I go to the games every chance I get, but tickets aren't cheap, you know?"

"I've heard that.  Broadway tickets aren't cheap, either."

Laugh, not a chuckle, an outright laugh. "This was $115, right?  That's NOTHING compared to a football game."  I didn't want to mention that I only paid $79 for mine, because I felt, for the first time ever that maybe Broadway wasn't as elitist as I thought it was!

Then he got quiet and very serious.  "I've never been to a play anywhere, ever.  I was always the guy in school who made fun of the plays and the drama."  Oh God!  My worst nightmare - confronting a bully!
"But" he continued "so far this isn't bad.  I mean it even looks like a football stadium in here, you know?"

"Um, no, I don't know..." I mumbled, "I've never been to a football game..."

A relieved look then a hearty laugh, "Are you [expletive] me?  Man, you gotta try it.  Really.  I mean here I am trying this.  You gotta try a game sometime... not even on TV??" 

"No."  He shook his head at me as the lights went down.


Being that the show was in the round, I could see the fans watching the play, each giving it such concentration and staring at Dan Lauria as if he really was Vince Lombardi.  I could see the relief on their faces when they realized it was funny and they could laugh, and their pride at being able to follow all the football talk.  But they also paid rapt attention to Judith Light, and I knew they were, to a person, into the play, when they reacted physically and verbally to a few rotten things Vince said to Marie.  The entire cast had them in the palms of their hands.

As the curtain call started, I noticed my companion looking uneasy again.  I leaned over and said, "If you liked it applaud, and if you really liked a certain actor go ahead and cheer."  He smiled and practically screamed when Keith Nobbs took his bow.  Well, I was super impressed with Ms. Light, and stood, as did many of the audience.  I looked back, and we exchanged a look that said it was OK for him to stand, too.  And he did, again yelling his approval for both leading players and the final company bow.

We were gathering our things, and I asked, "Well?  How was your first Broadway show?"  "Excellent!  I mean it, man.  Excellent!  I think I'm going to try another one soon.  Maybe take my wife.  She's at that Wizard of Oz show next door.  She loves this stuff.  She's right.  It is better than the movies!"
I laughed and smiled.  Don't you love looking at the newly converted?

And then he said something I will never, ever forget.  "So, how about you?  When are you going to a game?  I went to this.  Fair is fair!"  I'm not sure if I mumbled something or not, because the next thing I knew my hand was lost in his giant gloved hands as he shook mine, and said a simple, "Thank you."  He left as I was still putting on my coat.

As I exited, it was great to see lines of football jersey-ed men lined up at the merch stand buying Lombardi t-shirts.  And then it hit me for real:  fans are fans, no matter what they love.  The same passion, excitement and reverence.  And then it really hit me: I am such a theatre snob.  Shame on me.

Whoever you are, thank you, sir.  You will be on my mind when I go to my first game next year.  I promise I will go to one.

Fair is fair, indeed.

(Photos taken by me!)

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.co, or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.141

Friday, January 14, 2011

RANT: Of Previews, Postponements and Patrons' Rights

Of course, right after I bought tickets to the very first performance of Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark after February 7th, it is announced that the opening will be March 15th!  Ah well, such is life.  At least I'll be able to see how much work has actually been done on the show since the 5th preview, and I suppose, again after it finally opens (it's my money, shake your heads if you want!).

Of course II, this has and will re-open the debate about when to review, and is it fair to the public to see a show in previews, blah blah blah.

Earlier this week, Ken Davenport ran a blog post about the public's true opinion about whether or not a show being in previews mattered.  He did a un-scientific poll of people standing in line at the TKTS booth, and found that the vast majority of people polled didn't care as long as the show was good.  One of my favorite blog-buddies in the entire world, GratuitousV, took exception to the poll and is vehement that the public is being duped by shows that aren't ready being sold at full price. 

I can see and understand her point, and I even agree with her that stars of shows vacation schedules should be made universally known ahead of time so people can plan trips to see their favorites.  (Kudos, by the way to A Little Night Music and Women on the Verge of Nervous Breakdown; both shows posted vacation schedules for Catherine, Angela, Patti and Brian Stokes before a single ticket was sold to the public.)  And I also think it would be great to go back to the old days where there was a preview schedule of prices - again kudos to Women on the Verge, it wasn't much, but previews were cheaper.  And I do feel for people who plan whole vacations around a performance that gets cancelled.  Full refunds are never enough to equal that disappointment.

But the chief argument GV and so many others make that really frosts me, ESPECIALLY when they invoke the "draw of Spider-Man to crowds of children and tourists" is that people simply do not know the show hasn't officially opened and is in a state of flux. FOUL!  Spider-Man has been on the NATIONAL news almost daily for weeks.  If you don't know that the show hasn't officially opened, then it is on you at this point.

In an effort to be more fair and balanced about this topic which has so many of us in an uproar, I ran this past my friend Mike, who is much more practical in his love for theatre and whose opinion I value immensely.  He had this to say about my rant: "One specific thing that I maybe disagree about is your suggestion that, due to all the publicity, ticket buyers should know that the show is in previews. To be honest, a lot of the coverage I've seen has actually been misleading or inaccurate on this point, using phrases like "since the show opened..." or "the early reviews are...." So I don't think the coverage has helped educate people about the difference between a show in previews and one that's opened. But I do agree that there probably aren't too many people who care."


Then too, is the idea that the show itself isn't ready to the point that what you will see at given preview is ill-prepared.  Somehow, the theatre gods smiled upon me and I actually attended two previews - one of Verge, and one of Spider-Man, where they made headlines for a pre-show announcement that not everything would be working, and that the company hadn't done the whole show the whole way through many times, if at all.  In both cases, the only things that didn't (eventually) work were the things that ALL shows in previews have not working: the story and the music need more attention.  BUT did I not see a full production of both?  I sure did!  In BOTH cases, the show stopped for technical problems.  In both cases, everyone involved was highly professional - it was cool to see cast and crew work as one, and to actually give the hard working crew their due.  Also, in BOTH cases, the stoppages did not cause a single person to break character, lose their place in a song or scene, and never once did they lose composure.  Not a single person had a script in hand, no one in either show was ever in the wrong place, dances were sharp and crisp, not a lyric was dropped.  So, to say seeing a show in early previews - in these highly publicized cases, anyway - means you are seeing an inferior performance is ridiculous.  OK, both shows need/needed to be worked on as far as the book and music.  But who's to say that even if both shows open/ed to rave reviews that you won't still hate the book and the songs? (No matter how much you rave about The Phantom of the Opera, you won't make me love the book and the score.)

Further, it has been suggested but not a few people - though I will quote GratuitousV because she is well spoken and because I know she understands I'm not attacking her personally - that the public should be made fully aware that a show in previews might have the following issues.  And I have seen each of these separately from other bloggers and online chatters.


"Would you want to see a show in which some of the actors may not know their lines, the sets may get stuck, forcing the show to stop, and songs or dialogue may get added or cut as performances progress toward opening night? That's what a "preview" really means in some cases."

Let me address each element:
  • Actors may not know their lines - as I said neither thing happened in Verge or Spider-Man.  But I can say that it has happened many times in my experience to shows ALREADY open - to a full-price paying all-knowing audience.  And frankly, I think I find it more objectionable for a running show (though I generally find such bloopers the very stuff that makes LIVE theatre so great), especially when said performer is legendary and actually embraced for not knowing her lines for the entire run.  I'm talking, of course, of Elaine Stritch.  Didn't know lines, labored over her one song, and had the balls to mug happily over being so ill-prepared.  Why is it that she is applauded for it, but an actor in Verge or Spider-Man should be taken to task for it?  I have seen dozens of actors flub lines and lyrics, and always had fun watching them work through it.
  • The sets may get stuck - this can/does and will continue to happen.  Ask the guy at the Globe theatre, who fell through an open trap door during the opening of one of Shakespeare's plays.  We got a whole saying out of that - "Break a Leg!" means good luck now.  And that was waaayyyy back.  More recent examples that I can verify for having witnessed them myself:  At Les Miz, the revolving stage got stuck, causing a 20 minute delay, an offer of full refunds, and about 2/3 of the show done with the actors doing their best to recreate the feel without the movement.  Legally Blonde - Paulette's beauty parlor got caught in a curtain, bringing the show to a halt for ten minutes.  I saw Cats TWICE when the tire didn't levitate, and Wicked on tour when Elphaba didn't actually defy gravity. Watching the remainder of Act One of Grease (94 revival) when they couldn't get Greased Lightning out of the way was a real treat - Rosie O'Donnell's ad-libs were PRICELESS.
  • Songs or dialogue may be added or cut - Really?  You mean it isn't 100% done the first dozen or so times the show is performed?  How about AFTER the show opens and changes are made?  Ask Julie Andrews about Camelot or Victor/Victoria.  How about adding an unlisted song as a finale!!??  Ask the folks at American Idiot or Shrek: The Musical.  Then there's The Lion King AND Les Miserables who both cut whole songs and scenes out of their shows well into their runs.  All of these happened AFTER previews, and people weren't calling for beheading or even refunds.  And I won't even go into the whole Scarlet Pimpernel thing where one version was being performed while another was being rehearsed...  And what about when shows leave Broadway and are changed for the tour?  Whole songs and scenes are dropped and/or re-worked.  Talk about getting ripped off - people think the National Tour is a replica of the Broadway production.  Again, no lines for refunds... no public outcry.

Yes, a preview means all of those things.  But all of those things could and do apply to officially opened productions, too.


And changing the opening night, which started this rant in the first place, is also their right.  Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark IS, and I can verify it, the biggest, most complicated show EVER.  Bumps, starts and stops and postponements are going to happen.  Usually, people moan and groan when a producer won't stand behind his own show (The Scottsboro Boys, anyone?) and let it find an audience, or complain because more time to work on a show is needed but not given.  And yet, here we are slinging arrows at a producer who is putting his money where his mouth is.  He's letting his team get the show where they want it.  And, I understand that any performance that was halted - even the notorious one with Christopher Tierney plunging to serious injury - FULL refunds have been offered or seats to another performance have been given.  Not bad in that case, because the audience only missed 7 minutes of the entire show - the ending, which is/was incomplete at the time, anyway.  I also understand, though I can't verify it, that partial refunds have been offered to folks at those first few previews as well. 

All of that said, I can see and understand people's ire over the ever changing date, and that yes, there is plenty of blame for this to be laid at everyone's feet.  But at this point, what difference does it make, really?  It is a sellout almost every night, and looks to be around for awhile no matter what.  Hell, Beatlemania never officially opened and ran for years, anyway!

As for me?  Well I rank the early previews of Women on the Verge and Spider-Man amongst the most thrilling, exciting times I've had in the theatre.  There is nothing more LIVE than LIVE theatre at its rawest and most vulnerable.

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.136
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...